New Blog

Okay, I finally got tired of screwing around with my iWeb blog--I just got sick and tired of issues with sharing my articles on facebook. If you want to read old articles visit the old sites here and here. Here's to a new start!

Welcome first time visitors from Renew America!

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Cmon' Folks, Let's Get Real!



One of my favorite songs of all time is “Stand”; by Sly and the Family Stone! I don’t know Sly’s politics, although Sly may be a degenerate of the highest order, in Stand he raised universal, even Biblical truths!

If I were head of the RNC, this would be the song I would play before every rally! One of  “Stand’s” copious, steeped in wisdom lyrics, reads:



“Stand,
You've been sitting much too long,
There's a permanent crease in your right and wrong”


Last week the President declared his candidacy for the 2012 election, which will be perhaps the most critical one in the 21st. Century. I believe it will set the tone for America’s moral course and philosophy for the next hundred years.

It is imperative that as Conservatives we “Stand” for what we know is “right” and in opposition of what we certainly know is “wrong”! The courts again will be a major issue. We cannot allow the left to win again. There is too much at stake! Conservatives cannot afford to have the Supreme Court loaded with youthful, liberal justices primed to serve on the bench for decades.

The left is pulling out all of the stops. This election really needs to be about morality and principles without compromise. In fact, I am beginning to hate the word, “compromise”!

Compromise may have begun life as a concept nobly, but in modern America it has since warped into acquiescence.

Acquiescence is what happens when one of the compromising parties seems consistently to be the only one making concessions. This is surely the case in American politics today.

At no time has this sad truth been more easily recognizable than in the recent battle to pass a Federal budget for the nation’s fiscal year. To begin with, Republicans asked for a drop in the bucket and even that was reduced by the Democrats to a moist smudge.



Republicans couldn’t even manage to take a stand for the social riders they had placed in the budget. As a nation, if we’re getting basics like the right to life wrong, how on earth can we get anything else right? How long will we “Stand” for compromising on life?

The narrative during the budget debate was completely controlled by the media and the right lay down passively and took it. We who call ourselves conservatives are again allowing the media to shape our actions and thinking. Even on the grass roots level.

The amount of adjustment made to the budget was so infinitesimal, it could be claimed pyrrhic.  To paraphrase the eponymous King Pyrrhus: “ ‘One more such victory would utterly undo’ the country!”

Ironically, if this woefully inadequate and largely symbolic gesture towards fiscal responsibility had not been passed, we would not have had the money to pay the troops necessary to even have (God forbid) such a victory as Pyrrhus had at Heraclea against the Romans.

The Republicans lack the confidence in the American people’s support to properly wage this battle for the nation’s soul. We are too easily distracted! The left understands this and they use it to their advantage.

This is why the left, in truth, loves the question of the President’s eligibility to hold the office. There is legitimacy in questioning Mr. Obama’s reticence in sharing his credentials and records, but, this is a marginalizing issue. It is meat for the Conservative base and it should be of concern to the whole nation, but... it is not.

We on the right claim to understand how tragically and blindly supportive the left is when it comes to President Obama. That may indeed be the case when it comes to the liberal voting base. However, it is not true of the media or the political and economic powers behind the Democrats and Mr. Obama. This group knows exactly what Obama is!

It is the powers behind the Democrats, who convinced the conservatives John McCain was the offering to be placed in sacrifice before the Obama machine in 2008. It is happening again.

We keep seeing these brand name media straw polls coming out touting Mitt Romney as the Republican frontrunner. Meanwhile, no one we know ever talks about Romney except to say; “We don’t want him.”

Every straw poll conducted on conservative grassroots sites like the ones here on Digital Publius or Freedom Torch all suggest a decidedly different narrative than the one conveyed in the mainstream media.

Polls on all the grassroots sites show conservatives desiring to back candidates that  express the values and perspective that reflects their worldview... candidates who are proven conservatives. Not wishy washy politicians who follow the political climate.

This is what nags at me about the blossoming Tea Party support for Donald Trump! I have to admit I find it amusing that Trump makes so many leftist talking heads appear to squirm. Trump is saying all of the right things right now,  but after a period of sober minded reflection, I am not comfortable with Trump.

In the back of my mind I keep thinking about the Donald Trump that appeared so often on “Don Imus In The Morning” reveling in  Bush bashing a few years ago. The Trump who was so tragically short sighted when it came to the war in Iraq, and who was was pro-”choice”.  This Donald Trump:





Contrast that video with this more recent appearance by “The Donald”!


It seems The Donald has merely transposed George W. Bush’s name with Barack H. Obama’s. The most telling thing, the thing we should be paying closest attention too, is the attitude of the media-figures Trump talks to.

If we were going strictly by the leftist talking points In the first video, it would be impossible to tell Trump from Ed Schultz, Rachel Maddow or even Keith Olbermann and that was just a few years ago mind you.

Donnie Deutsch was only too eager to feed into The Donald’s all too frequent anti-Bush diatribes. This really looks no different from the way Matt Lauer and David Gregory supported Chuck Schumer and Steny Hoyer last week on the morning shows as they presented the DNC’s talking points and a singular unopposed perspective on the budget battle.

In the second video, we again see Trump being interviewed by Donnie Deutsch--This time we are treated to Deutsch and the rest of the panel smirking and derisively dismissing Trump as he spouts so called “birther” arguments! Arguments long since dismissed by people who have been fighting this battle since Obama came on the scene.

Fringe arguments like the President’s “Grandmother in Kenya”, long abandoned for their lack of strong evidential integrity. He is bringing up issues that have all been dealt with by the left, whether you find the answers credible should not be your bone of contention. It is a question of advancing persuasive arguments to the American people.

Anyone on the left worth their beans, who is prepared, could take Trump apart as we saw when he appeared on CNN, Suzanne Malveaux ate his lunch. The most powerful question that can be put in play when it comes to this issue is: Why is the President fighting so hard and committing so much money to suppressing his credentials? Why?

This is the question that no one ever answers. Trump has brought it up in a few interviews, but Donald never presses for an answer. He was so thoroughly handled by Malveaux that he never even asked that most pivotal question. The bottom line is this: This is not an issue you can win new votes with. It plays great with the base, but not the independents.

I refuse to believe Trump is  unaware of this, or the seemingly reasonable apologetics forwarded by Obama’s supporters on the weaker “birther” arguments. Trump is too smart! Or perhaps I give him too much credit.

I do not believe that Trump is a true conservative. 

I think Trump is nothing more than a complicit distraction to draw people away from the candidates we really need to support, who are true, longstanding conservatives. I don’t necessarily mean long time politicians, I mean clear, consistent and unwavering conservative voices.

Trump is a media creation--A left wing media creation! His show the “Apprentice” airs on NBC, while his network’s boss, Jeffrey Immelt is President Obama’s appointed head of the Jobs and Competitiveness Council (whatever that is) for goodness sake.

Trump’s bid for conservative support is nothing more than theater! Liberal stagecraft at it’s finest and most deceptive. Do not be fooled! “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark” It seems almost like the birth certificate issue is a faint.

You let the whole “birther” issue hit a fevered pitch as advanced by perhaps the nation’s greatest “pitch” man. Make him the champion of the issue, he secures conservative support and then “boom goes the dynamite”, the President finally submits and releases the long form birth certificate, conservatives look foolish and petty and Obama wins a second term.

A far more likely scenario sees the right marginalized even further so that we are forced to nominate the common since candidate the media really wants us to choose. So, again we offer a sacrifice like the feckless and unelectable Mitt Romney instead of a true conservative.


Sly’s song ends:

Stand
Don't you know that you are free
Well at least in your mind if you want to be
Everybody
Stand, stand, stand


Free your minds of the media’s manipulation this time around. Let’s not buy into the newly conservative Trumps or the chimerical Romneys. Let’s get real and support a conservative who has always been a conservative.

As always, I am reminded of Holy Scripture, specifically, Paul sharing the Gospel with the pagans in Athens at Mars Hill. The Holy Bible relates:

(For all the Athenians and strangers which were there spent their time in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing.) Acts 17:21

Let’s not be like the Athenian pagans always in pursuit of some “new thing”! The essence of conservatism is conserving those things we know are true and real! Donald Trump I am afraid is neither!

Digital Publius

83 comments:

  1. thank you for this well written article. I am truly concerned for all of us. Stand!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I never knew he did that song! Thanks for telling me that!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I had hoped people would get more out of my article than that Dawn LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  4. And I think the Birther controversy might play a lot into the next election now that there are many states that have drafted legislation to tighten the requirements for candidates who want to run for office; however, I think that Liberal judges will stall any lawsuits, or will even bring lawsuits into play which will keep any debate out of the courts and keep WE THE PEOPLE from drafting legislation which will tighten the requirements for candidates running for office. We shall see!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. You are most likely right. I think the left will do ANYTHING they can to keep him in power and themselves in power.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't trust Trump

    ReplyDelete
  7. Donald is not serious about running for President. Its entertainment and he stirs up controversy for his show. The only person I would even consider right now, is Rep. Allen West, and he says he won't run for President. But will consider VP. And I just don't believe that's where he should be. Its all or nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Carolyn Braun SmirhApril 10, 2011 7:42 PM

    I agree. Not a joke if he gains traction.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I personally doubt that Trump will win the nomination. In the past, as these things go on, the media scrutiny will flesh out these flash-in-the-pan candidates. My hope is that he does not run as an independent, then we'll have Clinton-Bush-Perot again. I agree, we have to stand, and stand together. I know that it is our right and our duty to vote for the person we will be best qualified to be president. But (and 'but' always negates what was just said) the much larger issue IS the the health and future of America. As conservatives, we have to stand together behind a conservative candidate. You are correct on every count Hassan. We must stop the left. We must make sure that judges are put into place who will support the Constitution and the Founding Father's ideals.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Great post, BTW.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Good points all. However, I trust Trump over Obama any day. We won't win with Romney. Or, for that matter, any of the suggested candidates. Trump may have the greatest chance of any of them. Especially if he exposes the scammer and liar in chief. So, at this moment in time I am all over Trump!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. So many of your articles have "knocked it outta the park."

    This latest article knocked it outta the entire CITY!

    I give praise to our God for you, and when we get to Heaven, I would be honored to spend a couple o' years - even decades, just hanging out and chatting with you. :-)

    I'm gonna share this, okay..?

    ReplyDelete
  13. There is an issue that divides Conservatives...traditional or NeoConservative. One , the former breeds people like Barry Goldwater, Patrick Buchanan and Ron Paul, the other wing, The Neocons, breed Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Mike Huccaby....these are the Wiliam Buckley Conservatives..the big govt moderates.

    We need to put a Good traditional Conservative in the White House...A Nationalist not an "Internationalist".

    ReplyDelete
  14. Great post Hassan. I am not behind any of the candidates in the current crop of hopefuls. Like American Lass, I firmly believe Allen West is the one bright spot on our horizon. I hope something will convince him to change his mind about running. I was hopeful that the 112th congress would go to Washington and do what they were elected to do. They were kind enough to douse me with a bucket of reality this week so I no longer had to foolishly hope that at last someone would show some integrity. The only integrity I have seen lately has been from Mr. West. I am praying that he will realize that the rest of the candidates will sell us out at the first opportunity and step forward.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Unfortunately, with my 52+ years of living---this I know. Whether they are Republican of Democrat, it doesn't really matter; because, when it comes down to it, they both have the same goal. They just have different ways of reaching it. That's the part of reality which is a sad fact!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Greg...it is sad when people say that "it doesn't really matter". If you are accurate, and I believe that to a certain extent that you are, the REAL reason that it doesn't matter is not because of Washington, but because of voters.

    1. We do not study the candidates enough. It is SHOCKING how little many of Obama's supporters knew about him...but it is more shocking that those same voters do not know anything about ANY candidates except what their party spoon feeds them. We tell others that it is their duty to vote. I tell people that if they are not willing to educate themselves...DON'T VOTE!
    2. We put party ahead of what is right/wrong. This is ridiculous.
    3. We do not hold our elected representatives to a high standard. How do tax cheats, criminals, adulterers, etc. get re-elected at such high rates? WE HAVE LOW EXPECTATIONS OF POLITICIANS so we vote in trashy candidates.
    4. We do not vote in primaries. How many people do you know that say that they do not vote in primaries because they do not mean anything? We see 87% of Congress re-elected when they have an approval rating of 9% because we do not vote in primaries. The only people who vote in primaries are those who keep nominating the same tired (and useless) candidates in the primaries, and in the general we have a choice between tired and useless, or the other party.

    Until we start holding our elected representatives accountable for what we hire them for, they will continue to do the same thing that they have been doing for decades.

    REMEMBER...THEY WORK FOR US. After you recall that...REMIND THEM!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  17. BTW, Hassan...EXCELLENT analysis. Thank you for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Michael WilliamsApril 10, 2011 9:06 PM

    I don't have a dog I like in this fight yet. Guess I am looking for a Pit Bull to take a bite out Obama. Most candidates I see are too timid and politically correct to attack. If any thing I do like the way" The Donald" is not afraid to say what he thinks.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Donald Trump=Flim Flam Man.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I so agree with your thoughtful analysis. A wise man in my area, Kim Wade, says sleeping with Obama in the White House is like turning in every night leaving a hyperactive four-year old still awake and in the kitchen. You have NO clue what new messes you'll find stirred up each morning. This has disoriented many of us. And, like people who are angered by the childish and silly messes, we react thoughtlessly. Instead of firmly and carefully removing the four-year old and repairing the damage, then remaining constantly watchful, we rave, holler, and think of 'tricks' to defeat his efforts. Trump is just one of these tricks. Temporarily appealing. But our full attention should be turned to deciding who, from a pretty impressive range of candidates, can spank the kid hard and send him to the playroom. There is no hope of getting him to clean up after himself at this point. We should have immediately pressed for candidate disclosure laws so no one can again play the tricks he's pulled with his 'veiled history.'

    ReplyDelete
  21. actually, i feel Romney is quite electable: he can sell the liberals on his financial expertise, the warm runny notion of American inclusion vis-a-vis religion in these times of Islamophobia, and his natural appearance that he's not as bad as "those other guys". under different circumstances i can and have supported his candidacy, but that time seems to have passed.

    i must say however that your warning on the Trump birther trap is dead on, and i am one who has been vocal on the issue since Day 1.

    ReplyDelete
  22. DAMN Hassan! This has to be your BEST blog yet. I was reading it and bobbing my head up and down with the most intense enthusiasm!!! WOW! YOU NAILED IT! We need to back away from Trump FAST! He's dynamite in the conservative camp. YES!

    Flim-Flam Man Scott... that's right.

    But Hassan, where you really got me was your insight on the media manipulating conservatives each and every time to insure that we "pick" the worst possible candidate! John McCain. And sorry to say - as much as I like him... George Bush, Bob Dole! CAN'T WE SEE THE MANIPULATION!?

    Last time the media was scared to death of Mitt Romney. They thought he'd be a strong contender against the Democrat. So they went all out against him. And you know what their most potent argument was? They kept telling us that the Christian base of the Republican party would never support a Mormon! Oh really? If the Mormom shares my political views, I sure would.

    Anyway, that got Romney knocked out and brought us McCain (which is worse I don't know... they both seem about the same to me - but the media probably figured McCain couldn't win).

    So Conservatives... we need to SOBER up. Yeah, Trump's a blast to listen to. But don't get carried away and think he's actually a viable conservative candidate. We need to listen to Hassan here. STICK TO OUR CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES. Trump doesn't fit in.

    Do you really think Trump has the depth of conviction to nominate real conservatives to the Supreme Court??? I don't. And for that reason alone I cannot support him.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I'm not completely a birther, but I DO believe that character matters, which is why I think that candidates with weak morals and character need to have their backgrounds investigated even more thoroughly. The American Way is to have all the cards on the table in order to make wise decisions, and that is not possible when all we get is a line of baloney or spin or downright deceit. I only like Trump because he is a true leader, not some Marvin Milquetoast/John Boehner/Lindsay Graham type who is afraid to offend the people who are trying to actually put a dagger in the heart of the country I love. Some people have great ideas and/or platforms, but are thoroughly unable to lead, can't organize much of anything, and always lose in when it comes down to performance.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I don't know of anyone in the GOP "establishment" that I would be in favor of running for President in 2012. They have all waffled on the major issues and/or compromised to the media and the left far too many times. I cannot trust any of them to "Stand" up for what is right..."And having done all to stand, Stand".

    Like American Lass, I would love to see Congressman Lt. Col. Allen West run for President with Herman Cain as a strong possibility as his running mate. Would the ACLU dare to bring the "race" card into that ticket? Is there anyone on the left, including Obama that could handle the intellect of either West or Cain? None that I'm aware of! Is there any foreign leader that would want to negotiate with West as President? No way!

    Trump and Huckaby are too Hollywood... Romney is too much like Obama on Health Care Reform and economic policy... Ron Paul may sound great making speeches, but I don't think he's man enough for the job of "Standing" in the Whitehouse... Newt is too much a part of the "good old boys" establishment for my liking.

    We could do a lot worse than either West or Cain for President!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Michael WilliamsApril 10, 2011 9:30 PM

    I agree Hassan , Cain has yet to become well known and the others aren't running . I just hope that Trump's notarity can help push a true conservative into the limelight simply.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @ Michael,
    The media keeps telling us that Cain and others have an uphill climb and we are allowing the media to convince us they have an uphill climb. Look at who people are talking about. It's Cain, West, Rubio, Ryan.

    If there is one thing we should have learned from the Obama campaign is that hills can be climbed. He came out of nowhere--He became the media darling because he had so much grassroot support before the establishment left glommed onto him.

    Remember, the establishment candidate was Hillary before Obama's army rocked the core of their party.

    Obama literally came out nowhere!

    Herman Cain for example, is a bigger name at the same point in the process than Obama was! We need to stop buying into this impossible uphill battle crap and go buy some rope, pitons and carabiners and start climbing!

    ReplyDelete
  27. To Jon Colson and Hassan: If you remember, it was basically the Democrats who put the idea of John McCain as a Presidential contender and the Republicans went right along with it. How dumb was that? And as far as my last comment, when I said it doesn't matter. Well, if you follow the money trail of ALL of the Presidential contenders, it generally leads to one place (and that's all that I will say about that, I'm not going to elaborate) All you have to do is follow the money trail and you will see what I mean.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I love Cain/West or West/Cain (and as someone said, the left can't bring the race card into play since that ticket is four times as black as Obama's ticket, lol). I like Bachmann and Palin and Gingrich in some ways. I would tolerate Huckabee. I don't like Romney or Pawlenty. While I like Trump's leadership, he fails miserably on social issues, and therefore I can't see myself campaigning for him. Neither would most people people I know.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I hear ya so well on this especially after attending my local Republican convention yesterday. Sadly, what I saw there doesn't give me much hope that Republicans fully realize or appreciate what the Tea Party helped them accomplish last November. There's GOT to be a better way!
    Great article, bro! :^)

    ReplyDelete
  30. Brillient analysis as usual Hassan. Your pen is truly mightier than the sword. I encourage all my friends and fans to read your postings.

    ReplyDelete
  31. The key here is to support true Constitutionalists. Trump has yet to talk about it. Is there anyone who is a true Constitutionalist...one that will vote to defund The department of Education...

    ReplyDelete
  32. I would like to see a candidate that understands the history of Trade policy in The USA !! Since day one our nation has been a Tariff-Protected-Nation and we have to get back to it. Free Trade is the path to De-Industrialization !!

    ReplyDelete
  33. Jim, I completely agree with you! The free-traders have only come into play in the last twenty years as a result of the Libertarian philosophy. 200+ years of Jacksonian and American School economics and all we hear about these days from some conservatives is the Austrian School, which are designed for countries that are traders, not manufactureurs and consumers and entrepreneurs, so that the traders don't have to incur additional cost. While Trump hit the nail on the head with China "owning" us, I hope other candidates pick up on this...

    ReplyDelete
  34. Trump is indeed an interesting man, everything is business, surely if we wanted him running a business perhaps he is the man; yet self-government of the biggest free nation on earth, is but a far distance from running a corporation. Our nation needs be fiscally responsible, but this alone is not America, we need security, economic growth, and most importantly our Constitution needs be followed completely. A man for President must have unwavering principles, of such high qualities and qualifications, citizens look up to him, and he is worthy of such adoration, in a most humble manner. Compromising must not be done when it harms or interferes with human welfare of any citizen; equality is not giving to the 'poor' while harming the successful in their pursuit of happiness, a leader allows for citizens to self-govern, deciding what is best for the nation.
    I have yet to see any one come close to what America needs, to compromise at such a time in history, is suicidal for America; my vote shall not be one to put the noose about our necks. Who yet have you heard stand firm, declaring America needs radical abolishing of all laws, mandates and regulations being un-Constitutional; who has come forward in Congress in firm resolve to stop all progression of this tyrannical regime? We have not seen nor have we heard any one so bold as to tell the truth to the American people, we are dying from a slow death of Socialism/Communism, that our current President is neither qualified nor is he leading a self-governed nation, he is acting and ruling in the true sense of a despotic ruler; that the citizens of America so long as we allow this administration or anything of the like to continue, we are not free but oppressed. You think anyone is willing to take that stand? When he does, we have our man.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Bravo, Hassan!!! Excellent points!!!

    ReplyDelete
  36. I hope that Trump runs for the nomination and that he can be useful to expose Obama's illegitimacy. Other than that, I think the two most useful potential GOP nominees to be able to take the re-election away from BHO, would be Huckabee or Bachmann - in that order...........

    ReplyDelete
  37. Thank you! I couldn't agree more!!!

    ReplyDelete
  38. Jayne Davis WoodsApril 10, 2011 11:53 PM

    Excellent Hassan! I shared it for others to read!

    ReplyDelete
  39. I can't think of one true conservative who is electable. Trump does not have a political record to kill him, but there is probably plenty of dirt to through at him. That would be pretty hypocritical of the Dems, but that would not stop them. The dirt would not defeat him like it would have done in Bush. Trump does not pretend to be perfect and is a take no prisoners type of person who usually gets his way. I don't see any better candidate to run against BHO and getting rid of him is more important than putting a true conservative in the white house.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Lets not forget who first re-ignited the birth certificate question. None other than Chris Mathews. That alone tells me there is dirty spin at work with that. Trump is making noise. Some of it good. He will not be the nominee anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  41. running and winning are TWO COMPLETELY Different things..... i cannot think of any thing better that the showdown of ideas to take place in America NOW!

    ReplyDelete
  42. I can think of only one true viable ticket in 2012 at this point in time. Cain/Bachmann. Cain would need Bachmann's experience to navigate legislative waters where he has little experience. I think Bachmann's integrity and conservative record is untouchable, as well as bringing in the vote from women. It would give Bachmann some nice experience in an executive setting. That could set us up for 16 years of conservatism. If they could get Condie Rice on board for SOS that could be a team that got things done. No matter what anyone says Condie is just plain impressive in my book. Just my nickels worth.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Michael bailey said:

    "and getting rid of him is more important than putting a true conservative in the white house."

    That is precisely the type of thinking that got us into the trouble we are in today. Compromising principle for expedience. You missed the point of my article Michael, we can no longer afford shallow positions like yours or shallow politicians like Trump. We need to throw are support behind true conservatives not carpetbaggers and opportunists.

    ReplyDelete
  44. In fact that attitude Michael is exactly the attitude that Obama supporters had when they were blind to all of his flaws and elected an idea instead of the reality of an inexperienced junior senator. Trump is nothing more than a plain dealing opportunist at best, or a tool of the enemy used as a distraction at worst! I don't like either possibility when there are so many bright and legitimate conservative options out there.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Getting rid of Obama is important, but not end all. Anyone that thinks booting him out is going to be easy is fooling themselves. What is more inportant is to strengthen conservatism in the house, and take control of the senate from that poor excuse of a human being Harry Reid. Ogoomba can do little under those circumstances. Remember that most of what Bush did that we disagreed with was done while the progressives controled congress. Most of his spending came in the last two years. If we can't beat him we can make him a neutered dog for four years. Taking congress is doable. Booting Obama might be a lot harder.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Throwing out Harry Reid as the Senate Majority Leader will be fun when the Republicans pick up a few more seats, but then we are going to be stuck with an insanely RINO Senate... incredibly it will be even worse than anything the House ever was, because one look at the all-important Appropriations Committee, shows it has Murkowski, Collins, McConnell, Graham, and Coats, and maybe 2 or 3 fiscal conservatives out of the 14 Republican members, and very few members who aren't moderates or worse on social issues, too.

    ReplyDelete
  47. That's why we have to build what we have in the house Robert. Then the RINO's will at least have to buck a "hard core" house. The house is where the people are supposed to be heard. That message has to be deafeningly loud.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Michael...That kind of thinking is a HUGE part of the problem. Barack Obama won because the black vote showed up in higher numbers than ever before, because there were a LOT of white voters who jumped on the "it is time for a black president" bandwagon, and because the media went from a liberal slant, jumped over advocacy right into a slobbering love affair.

    That nostalgia is over. Barack Obama has alienated...pretty much everyone.
    The far right will show up in record numbers....because of everything that he stands for and everything that he has tried to do.
    The moderate right are also going to show up in large numbers because of him ramming the health care crap down our throats and his spending.
    The far left are not going to show up because they do not think that he is liberal enough.
    The center left will be his biggest voting block and many of them will not show up because they feel that he has overstepped his authority.
    Even much of the black vote will not show up (unless there is a black republican candidate) because they did not seem to get any of that "OBAMA MONEY" he promised.

    NOW is the time to put a true conservative in office. Much like the first Jimmy Carter was crushed by Reagan....Jimmy Carter II will be crushed by a strong conservative candidate. If we put up another McShame, I will write in someone. I will NEVER AGAIN vote for the lesser of two liberals.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Robert...this is why we need to urge conservative voters to throw out the RINOs. But the ONLY place that this can take place is in the primaries. If we do not get conservative voters to the primaries, the "good ol' boys" who always vote choose the candidate that they have chosen for 20 years...because it is the only name that they remember.

    TRUE CONSERVATIVES NEED TO SHOW UP AT THE PRIMARIES AND THROW OUT ALL RINOs.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Laura E. ThompsonApril 11, 2011 2:43 PM

    I believe you are correct. Trump is creating theater and distraction from a true conservative who will "STAND" and lead us out of this mess. I prayed that Jim DeMint would run but he has declined, so for meit is likely to be a coice for Bachmann. Even Huckabee made cmomments Saturday night about the acquiescence to the Democrats and I was shocked. He said it could be brought up at a different time but not to let those social issues be brought into the budget solution. Are you kidding me? Yes, it is small potatoes in the great scheme of things, but it is a spending issue AND a moral issue as well. I was sorely disappointed at his comments.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Hassan, just to let you know, this topic has been on my mind all day and has featured prominently in several conversations I have had today. That is the mark of a good read!

    ReplyDelete
  52. Jon, if your comments are in response to mine I don't disagree. The fact of the matter IS that not all of the house and senate are up for election in 2012. Many of the RINO's like McCain and most of the dems will have four more years. No matter how the election goes they will still have to be dealt with. As far as Obama goes. Getting rid of him won't be a cake walk. A 1 billion dollar campaign fund, and the media in his pocket coupled with his base are formidable. The dirty spin hasn't started because they don't have a target, and he still has a nearly 50% overall approval. Whoever the republicans run is in for one down and dirty battle.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Chris...Obama is NOT over 50% in CNN, Gallup, Rasmussen, Fox News, NBC or Pew. Not sure where you get that. But I do think that it will be easy to beat him. I actually do not think that we will have to. I think that he has already defeated himself. But we STILL need to stay vigilant and show up to vote in large numbers.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Nope, not over 50%. Last I saw was maybe a week ago. I think it was Rasmussen had him at 47% overall. what doesn't jive is the polls on what he does. They are in the toilet, but he goes along with republicans on an issue after fighting all the way and his numbers jump up. I guess some just think he's a nice guy. From here out you will be able to watch his numbers improve as he makes like he's playing nice and being "bi-partisan".

    ReplyDelete
  55. The polls are not following what you say. They have been dropping. Even Rasmussen has him at 44%. A few days ago, CNN and Gallup had him at 51% and 50% respectively. He is going down and going down rapidly. As more people start paying attention, those who voted for him the first time are going to wake up to the fact that he has done pretty much nothing that he promised.
    GITMO closed? NOPE
    Out of wars? NOPE...In one more than when he took office.
    Patriot Act ended? Nope...extended.
    Wiretaps ended? Nope...expanded.
    National health care? Sort of...but not what he promised and likely to be repealed as unconstitutional.
    Open Congress? Nope...the most secretive in history
    Repeal Bush Tax Cuts? Nope...extended
    Bi-Partisanship? Nope..."The republicans can come along, they just have to ride in the back of the bus."

    Many of his supporters are either going to vote against him on principal or not vote at all.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Yup, but the thing is that most of those issues are lib issues. Sure they are saying they don't like him because of them, but when it comes time to pull the lever where are they going to go? Republican? Nope, they will do what all good conservatives do. Hold their nose and vote for the lesser of their evil, and believe me any republican running will to them be made all kinds of evil.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Chris...actually considering the number of them who voted for the first time for Obama, I think you will see a great deal of them stay home.

    ReplyDelete
  58. I wonder if we could arrange a Michael Moore movie marathon on NBC to air on election day. They would forget all about voting. I hope your right, and think you probably are. The incompetent and uninformed shouldn't vote anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Everyone assumes America be running fine, a bit of few wrongs, but nothing a good leader could not fix. My friends, America is not what it ever was, it is not free, it is not self-governed, we are all being ruled by a government over the wee people, we are no longer we the people. The two parties are nothing more than two country clubs, with the good ole boys running the show. To hell with the 'we the people', they assume we are too lazy, too stupid and uninterested in politics, leave it all to them so they envisioned us saying and they have. If anyone believes we will have a chance electing a bold conservative, true we the people representation, your dreaming. The good old boys will only put up who they want and will support, it is not our show, it is theirs. We have to forget about elections and concentrate on pushing back, demanding an over turn of all the evil doings; find new blood; strong, bold, conservative blood. A man with the Constitution by his side and a holy book on the other, believing in all the founding principles, ready to defend the supreme law and we the people. He cannot be of the club, he must face down the club members, and he must not compromise on anything that is not worthy of benefiting we the people. Now, if anyone thinks they know that man, let him stand up. Trump and the rest are not of the quality, we shall watch Ryan and Rubio, both may have good conservative qualities but they must show their boldness as a patriot, never backing down on principles; if Ryan backs down on the budget he's shown he is not strong enough. If he cannot face Obama now with the people behind him, how then can he face the odds during an election? America is facing not an election, but the election of a leader during a revolution, the people cannot live any longer in misery, we shall unite and take it back; the leader is who we are looking for.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Nadine...I think that your heart is in the right place, but you make no sense whatsoever in a couple of ways.

    1. You start by basically saying that there is nothing we can do, then you go on to say that we can do this.

    2. You think that we need some dynamic leader to lead us in taking back our country. NO WE DO NOT! We need A LOT of leaders around the country to seek out strong conservatives and get them elected. One will not do. We could get a dynamic president, but that would not be enough, it would merely be a start. We need A LOT of strong conservatives to fight for WE THE PEOPLE once again. I like the "armed with the Constitution under one arm and the Bible under the other. But if people think that one leader can pull this off, we have already lost

    ReplyDelete
  61. Chegoda PresentApril 13, 2011 9:20 AM

    Nadine, I understand your cynicism and pragmatic overview. We must, however, not give into those twins of potential despair by the appearance of conditions. We, the People still have the ability to fight back if we release the apathy and complacency. I think we need to just find the strength in our voice and put them into action. I agree with Jon in this regard-we will have chosen a leader, but we can no longer set them up as our spokesperson and return to our complacency recliner. Freedom's protection lies in a united effort. We MUST stay positive, learned and hear and see with our eyes and ears open so we are no longer taken in with such words as 'fundamental transformation'. The meanings are scewed to draw in the unwary. It is hard, but what must be harder is losing freedom, our America and our souls. Once lost, freedom is difficult to reclaim.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Now we know what the Donald really wants to do... run as an indie and give Obama 4 more years.

    ReplyDelete
  63. I agree. He's trying to capture the hard right that question eligability. He thinks he can hold that segment firmly if he keeps after the issue, and that will be enough conservative votes siphoned off. It's almost obvious because he is NOT a conservative as we know it.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Todd "tryanmax" MaxwellApril 13, 2011 9:24 AM

    Excellent article, Hassan. And many great comments, too. I don’t think I’ll find disagreement here that Trump at this time is potentially the worst possible combination of P.T. Barnum and Ross Perot.

    ReplyDelete
  65. I predict this is what Trump will say in his first speech as a candidate: "I wish President Obama had not failed. But he has, so that's why I'm running for President. I'm the only candidate who can beat him, so send me your money."

    ReplyDelete
  66. Todd "tryanmax" MaxwellApril 13, 2011 9:25 AM

    So you don't think he'll work a "You're Fired!" in there somewhere?

    ReplyDelete
  67. I find him to be a distraction, maybe because I will never ever consider him Presidential material. He is very much like Ross Perot--RIGHT ON! Another gem worth sharing on FB, Hassan! Now...THAT HAIR. If that's not a flat-out distraction, then I don't know what is. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  68. Found and shared....

    Reply by Hanen 19 hours ago

    I'm getting sick of listening to TRUMP in the first place we did all the research on OBAMA a few years ago and TRUMP knew all about it back then and didn't say a word. He's a fraud like OBAMA, they say what ever it takes to get people to listen to the BS.


    In all, Trump has contributed to 96 candidates running for federal political office since the 1990 election cycle, the Center finds. Only 48 of the recipients -- exactly half -- were Republicans at the time they received their contribution, including ex-Gov. Charlie Crist (I-Fla.) and ex-Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.), who both of whom received their Trump contributions as Republicans.

    Since the 1990 election cycle, the top 10 recipients of Trump's political contributions number six Democrats and four Republicans. Embattled Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.), who was censured last year by his U.S. House colleagues, has received the most Trump money, totaling $24,750. The most recent contribution from Trump to Rangel was a $10,000 gift during the 2006 election cycle.

    In the most recent election cycle, Trump doled out $22,500 to political candidates, of which $16,200 benefited Democrats.

    The top Republican recipient of Trump's money is Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) who has collected $13,600 from the billionaire magnate, the second most of any politician. Trump did not contribute to McCain during the 2010 election cycle, during which the former presidential candidate was facing re-election.

    Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) is the recipient of $12,000 in Trump contributions, including $10,000 for his 2006 re-election campaign.
    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has received the fourth-largest amount of Trump's contributions, including $4,800 in the successful 2010 campaign against Tea Party favorite Sharron Angle. In total Trump has contributed $10,400 to Reid.

    In 2010, Trump also contributed $4,000 to Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who easily won re-election. Schumer has received $8,900 from Trump since the 1996 election cycle. Trump has also been generous to New York's other Democratic U.S. senator, Kirsten Gillibrand, who's received $5,850 in Trump money.

    After McCain, the Republican with the largest amount of Trump's contributions is former Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.), who left office in disgrace in 2006 when his online solicitation of male House pages became known. Trump contributed $9,500 to Foley between the 1996 and 2006 election cycles.

    Trump has also supported other notable politicians, including:
    • $7,000 to former Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), the "liberal lion of the Senate"
    • $7,500 to former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani (R)
    • $5,500 to Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) including $2,000 during his 2004 presidential run
    • $5,000 to former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.)
    • $4,000 to former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.)
    • $2,000 to former President George W. Bush (R)
    • $1,000 to then-Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.)

    Trump's donations to various political action committees and 527 groups also demonstrate his bipartisan checkbook.

    During the most recent election cycle, Trump contributed $170,000 to the Republican Governor's Association, $50,000 to the ultra-conservative American Crossroads PAC, $30,400 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee and $10,000 to the Democratic Party of New York.

    ReplyDelete
  69. However, of the nearly $420,000 Trump has donated to committees, the largest recipient has been the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee with $116,000 -- or more than one fourth of his total contributions to all party and political action committees.

    Then comes the BS story that hes a successful business man. Since when does going Bankrupt make you a success. The bank keeps giving him money. Last week I saw he couldn't make his loan payment he bought a NEW Plane.

    The American Way, he lives like the AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. BORROW BORROW BORROW and never pay it back. Then sue the lender for more money than you borrowed. See TRUMP vs DEUTSCH BANK

    Wake up America we need to change the way things are done. The only people who can play in the political game are elites who have a lot of money. The really good people don't stand a chance. I see people acting about Trump like they did about OBAMA.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Well here, let me give you a little clue bout something....THESE ARE THE PRIMARIES......NOT A FREAKING CROWNING CEREMONY!!! THE PRIMARIES ARE A COME ONE, COME ALL WHO "THINK" THEY CAN BETTER THE COUNTRY......and allow "we the people " to decide among those who will run.....now while you may prefer to choose a king or a queen, I PREFER THE PRIMARIES! OK!! In my opinion when someone starts whining about someone joining the race...it just means their candidate cannot hold their own ....and hey, if someone cannot outright win the primary as a clear front runner.....i sure as hell do not what to see them in the white house.....i have not heard a single person who did not hate the fact the someone is getting in the race

    ReplyDelete
  71. Welcome Donald Trump, Michelle Bachman and who ever else lines up.... Go Sarah Palin.... I am confident and sure of my candidate...and she sure as hell is not intimidated by anyone! But man ...sure are a lot of WHIMPS in the voting block of the republican party!

    ReplyDelete
  72. There are those citizens too afraid to stand; they wait for wise, bold men to stand up; become part of the front line, encouraging fine Americans with only freedom in their hearts to move up behind you. Within the lines, there will be seen a leader or few, it is here the next leader emerges. No prominent figure yet has shown he or she can undo what is done. have the courage to admit it cannot be undone, but torn down and rebuilt. Everyone is in fear of losing constituents, afraid of offending; stop the unreasonable nonsense, speak up, speak out, stand up and start taking the nation back.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Any body remember a funny looking fellow by the name of Ross Perot? A little De Sha Vu? Something smells a little fishy here. We will see when he and West show up together in Florida.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Excellent post Hassan. I think we should all be looking at what Trump has done in the past. Who he has supported, who or what party he has donated to. Who he associates ith and any connections to Obama or big wig Dems. I'm very leery when they come out of the blue like the Donald has. As far as I can tell Trump hasn't tackled any of the big things about Obama such as his miserable treatment of our allies. Just saying!

    ReplyDelete
  75. Trying to make people see that Trump is a phony/flim flam man and that conservatives should not be fooled by him is not being wimpy. It is trying to educate people so they don't waste time on idiots. That is how it works. How you get wimpy out of that is beyond me. You want to narrow down the field to a manageable degree and to do that people need to know all about whomever is running especially in the primaries. We don't want goofballs/spoilers getting in because of money and or name recognition and then maybe causing a good candidate to be squeezed out. That is why I will yell from the rooftops Donald Trump is a joke and nobody should waste their time on him and his publicity stunt. If I can get enough people to see just how silly this man as president would really be so as to stop them from even thinking about voting for him then that is not being wimpy it is doing my patriotic duty as a citizen of this country.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Won't argue with you Scott, but I like that he's stirring the pot all the way down at the bottom. I don't know if he has the answers, but darn it the rest of the world does take advantage of us, and is bleeding us dry. For some reason we are content letting them.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Others have said the same things as he is saying. It is because of his name recognition and money that he is getting showcased in my opinion. Sadly it is in all of us to some degree that we like to get on bandwagons of people with money/fame. Most of the time we get burned when we do. Can you say Arnold for a recent example. I remember being told I was wrong about him too when I said he was not a conservative and would not be good for republicans. I also think the MSM want him out there because they know he is not good for conservatives and of course he is good for their ratings. As for the conservative radio hosts and many regular conservatives I think their anger/outrage at Obama has them grasping at any straw that seems to have some traction and letting all the facts of what he has been and done in the past just be excused. Many people can state the problem and say they can fix it. It is up to us to make sure they can before we start celebrating them as a champion/leader for the cause. As for myself I have zero faith in this guy and don't trust his motives. That is my stand and if I am proven wrong so be it but I like my odds of not being wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  78. No way I could support 'The Donald' for POTUS

    ReplyDelete
  79. Brother, I agree with you that up to this time this is the most important presidential election that this country has ever faced. I think that if Mr. O gets reelected that our country will not survive his policies. I think he will financially ruin this nation. Neither do we like Romney. Whoever the repubicans nominate needs to be someone who can set the conservatives on fire and be willing to get out and vote to save this nation.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Did anyone listen to the interview on Rush's show with Trump. The more Trump talks the more he scares me in the same way obama did when he first started campaigning. I though Trump was just entertainment, but now the thought that he may actually be serious is frightening.

    ReplyDelete
  81. USA is falling apart: it will no longer be a super power...but an Imperialist piece....

    ReplyDelete
  82. I'm for Bachmann and Cain in any order. Bachmann is able to come across as so much more intelligent than Palin, though I don't doubt Palin's intelligence, just her presentation. Bachmann has guts and political sense; Cain has heart and business acumen. I think we have some great people to choose from, but please forget about Romney. He's an opportunist just like the politicians we want to get away from. I adore Huckabee but he's just too lovable for our times. Thanks for keeping the "eye on the ball" and helping us to see things clearly, Hassan. Love you man! :-)

    ReplyDelete