New Blog

Okay, I finally got tired of screwing around with my iWeb blog--I just got sick and tired of issues with sharing my articles on facebook. If you want to read old articles visit the old sites here and here. Here's to a new start!

Welcome first time visitors from Renew America!

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Branded (Election Afterthoughts)



“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” ~ Albert Einstein
Few adages are as readily available to the American consciousness as the one quoted above. Yet, there are even fewer that are more frequently forgotten. Nowhere is the tacit rejection of Einstein’s truism more painfully apparent than in America’s urban areas.
Urban areas mired in corruption and collapsing school systems, decaying infrastructures providing fewer and fewer services to a citizenry still expected to pay taxes, inner city denizens clinging maniacally to those failed policies and the leaders who implement them — this particular election cycle provided a rather unique glimpse at the near total perfection of liberal Democrats’ hold on Black voters’ thinking and political actions in the inner cities across the nation. 
What the 2010 midterm elections showed is that the “D” in front of a candidate’s name is even more powerful in urban Black consciousness than common sense, reason and even skin color. Despite the fact that many of these areas have not elected a conservative official in decades, they seem incapable of surmising that it may be a good idea to try something different.
“The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.” ~ Albert Einstein
The American independent voters (that block of people often responsible for a swing one way or another politically) decided this time that the “Change” they voted for in 2008 was far beyond what they expected. So, they swung back the other way this election in even greater numbers than 2008.
Independents are by nature reactionary, a characteristic I find difficult to regard highly myself, yet one that is at least to a degree understandable. This makes the slavish devotion to the Democratic party exhibited by my people more troubling. Why do we continue to hold to a party whose precepts have decimated our communities?
In the races where you had a Black Republican as an alternative to a Black Democrat, or even a Black Republican against a White Democrat, the urban areas still opted for the Democrat. This was the case in Jesse Jackson, Jr.’s race against Republican Isaac Hayes in Illinois as well as the race of California Democrat Laura Richardson, who faced Popular Republican pundit Star Parker. Ms. Parker’s story is truly an inspiration for those seeking to better their situation in life and exactly the image most needed in Compton.
Corruption charges against incumbent politicians seem not to matter, either. Eternal Congressman Charlie Rangel had no trouble brushing aside Michael Faulkner.
Tennessee’s 9th Congressional district Black Republican candidate, successful business woman Charlotte Bergmann, received an anemic 25% of the vote in her race against incumbent White Democrat opponent Steve Cohen, despite a 60% Black population in the district. In fact, it is the states only predominately Black district. It’s not a black thing, it’s a “D” thing.
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” ~ Albert Einstein
To counter Einstein’s faithful adage defining insanity, we find this bromide:
“It doesn’t matter what party is in power, nothing ever changes, all politicians are alike.”
To all those Black Democrats languishing in cities like Detroit, Cleveland and Memphis who employ this banal and wholly unoriginal bit of fluff, I ask; how would you know?
During the slave trade, it was not uncommon for a master to brand his slaves with a hot iron. This served as a constant reminder to the slave that he was not his own. This brand ran far deeper than the raised scar it produced. It meant that you knew to whom you belonged and that you mustn’t entertain any ideas of your station changing.
The modern slave master’s brand is unseen but no less effective. The Democrats say you’ll be free, but not yet. You’ll get your freedom, but it will be a freedom defined by “us”. This is why the Democrats are always reminding you that everyone else is racist. They reinforce daily that you cannot succeed without them being there to pave the way for you.
In the past, the slave masters employed overseers to make sure that the slaves stayed in their places and performed as they were expected. These overseers were charged with disciplining the slaves as well. Frequently, the most zealous of these overseers were themselves slaves — all too willing to keep the order in the slave quarters if it ensured a few extra creature comforts for themselves.
In many cases, these Black overseers reacted more vehemently to Black rebellion than any White overseer. We see this played out today as Black folks become unhinged when someone has the temerity to stray from the Democratic plantation, spewing the very invective that they accuse the right of espousing. This is trained behavior; some of the most effective training takes place when the subject is unaware they are being trained.
“If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.”  ~ Albert Einstein
Of course, as the left explains, their crushing defeat at the polls is due to the “inability” of the hoi poloi to “grasp” the beneficence they have bestowed upon us. The President just “failed to communicate” how successful he and his sycophants have been. It is indeed difficult to explain why ideas that have never worked are still completely ineffectual. “Hope” indeed springs eternal!
At some point, the Black community has to realize it has been flimflammed, or at the very least come to a point were they are willing to consider an alternative to failure. This is what wise, thinking people do in order to extricate themselves from circumstances they are dissatisfied with — unless of course they fail to recognize they are dissatisfied. Then they are simply fools!
Chicago serves as a fairly good example of what I am talking about. President Obama’s former senate seat was lost to a Republican as the President’s former constituents opted for a change of guard. Interestingly, Roland Burris, the only serving Black senator, appointed to replace President Obama, was strongly advised not to seek re-election.
Burris is just one of a string of Black elected officials encouraged to step aside by the President and the Democratic machine — a list that included most notably New York Governor David Paterson and Kendrick Meek of Florida. Meek won the Democratic nomination for the senate fair and square, but was asked to step aside for the White Charlie Crist.
Crist, a former Republican running as an independent, pledged to caucus with the Democrats, which made for a more acceptable choice for the Democratic party than the Black Democrat the people of Florida chose. Meek earned 20% of the votes Tuesday While the usurper Crist garnered 30%. This opened the Door for Republican Marco Rubio to win the election with 49% of the vote.
How well would Meek have done if the Democratic party-backed Crist had not taken 30% of the vote away from him? It seems painfully apparent, at least in the cases of Burris and Meek, that the left has an aversion to black senators. You are fine with the Democratic party as long as you are the kind they want — the kind that won’t try to escape the plantation and start believing in their ability to overcome by their own means.
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius — and a lot of courage — to move in the opposite direction." ~ Albert Einstein
The entire constitution of the United States, complete with amendments, fits on a couple of pages in the back of my Webster’s dictionary. The healthcare bill, threatening to burden the nation for generations to come, is thousands of pages long. Does this make sense to you? How long will my people continue to put their faith in government and the Democratic party instead of hard work and God, who was the Founders’ strength?
“For that they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD; They would none of my counsel, they despised all my reproof. Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices.” Proverbs 1:29-31
Digital Publius

53 comments:

  1. Always good reading Hassan. Einstein's notoriety as a physicist is well known. His philosophical genius is often forgotten. A true great mind has many facets to offer.

    The democrat party hold on the view of championing minority causes is not only illogical, but false. Many need to be taught a good dose of history to realize this. unfortunately not many want to teach, and many don't want to learn. Long held generational beliefs are difficult to change, but push forward we must.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Midfield GeneralNovember 4, 2010 7:39 AM

    Funny.. Einstein despised conservatism...irony lost

    ReplyDelete
  3. Einstein took issue with capitalism, a physicist cannot despise conservatism. That being said, Einstein like many who exist in an almost purely intellectual and didactic paradigm often argue against themselves. The principles I quoted in the article are sound even if the coiner failed to always adhere to them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very true Hassan. I think that most likely stems from that true scientific mind that always pushes beyond the conventional wisdom. Constantly stepping over the border of the real world into the impossible and realizing that what was impossible is now the

    ReplyDelete
  5. Midfield GeneralNovember 4, 2010 8:08 AM

    "a physicist cannot despise conservatism"....really? how is that

    ReplyDelete
  6. It would be a direct violation of the first law of thermodynamics! Irony lost?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Astute as always, Hassan. Excellent parallel to the slave branding. Mental conditioning is, as you say, often done unaware to the affected.

    @ Midfield General: you posite no counter and no reasoning for your position. Thus, what you write is known as a "hit and run."

    Can't back up your point?

    Joe Young ECC

    ReplyDelete
  8. I like what you say; although the truth of what you say saddens me.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Could it be that it is an attempt to maintain their lives the way they know them? There are those people in the country, and I would say particularly urban areas such as you speak of, where this way of life; living on subsidy, surviving on government assistance, living in federal housing is the life. The people they elect maintain that life. In my eyes not a real life, not a free life. But these are unemployed, under educated, disabled and other disenfranchised who have no prospects with another system, so while it appears to be insanity to many of us, it seems perfectly sensible if your lifestyle is so tenuous. Think of those left in New Orleans during Katrina. We have a nation with city upon city with those constituents. Who is for them?

    ReplyDelete
  10. If that is indeed the case Stefani, we are screwed! How does anyone advance in that manner? If things are as you describe they may be, then I would have to repeat what I wrote in the article:

    "At some point, the Black community has to realize it has been flimflammed, or at the very least come to a point were they are willing to consider an alternative to failure. This is what wise, thinking people do in order to extricate themselves from circumstances they are dissatisfied with — unless of course they fail to recognize they are dissatisfied. Then they are simply fools! "

    ReplyDelete
  11. But the question would be how? In light of the real? There is this group of citizenry in America that is totally dependent upon governmental services and many in that group are black americans but not exclusively. Homeless, indigent, disabled, mentally ill, disenfranchised in significant numbers all left out there together. An underbelly so to speak that we continue to see and deny. It is for these that there are fears regarding Obamacare and other plans that would round them all up and "deal" with them. Who stands for these? Corporations? Churches? Or simply like our war on terror---throw money at it and ignore?

    We have no one left at home during the day to care for our elderly or our children or are disabled. We are all out there working so that we can pay our taxes, keeping our nose to the grindstone, unable to look up. We have hours that run from 6am until 8pm. Commercials telling us the value of eating meals together. Nothing is as it was and those POOR poor among us are left behind and un-thought of. That was glaringly obvious in Katrina.

    ReplyDelete
  12. ‎@Hassan I have been saying that for years, what the democratic party does to many is enslave them. its truly disgusting

    ReplyDelete
  13. An excellent article Hassan. You have articulated well that the majority of our Black Americans support the democratic cause. And will continue to do so despite any and all given reasons to reject them. However, since I am not of your race, I am not the best qualified to address Black Americans' reasoning as to why they almost to the person will only vote the democrat line. But, with men of your character and ability may I encourage you to keep up the good fight and do what you can to inform others of the democratic strangled-knot placed on their lives. Perhaps some will listen to you and then untie the knot for themselves. | Blessings, my friend.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Shared. In doing so, I asked "How do we get people to consider another viewpoint?" Hassan, do you have any insights? Here in MS CD-2 we had an excellent conservative black man to run against our progressive incumbent. Also of color. Not really close. We are however beginning work for 2012.

    ReplyDelete
  15. You are once again, so right my friend. You say "how long will MY people....." I don't think it is a black thing, I think it is black and white and I believe as long as the gov't keeps offering something for nothing, they will keep voting in those who offer them something for nothing; those who don't want to work will keep depending on those who offer them roses for sand. Because the roses turn into sand and slip through their fingers. These professional politicians have learned who will and who won't believe their lies. It is those who listen to the secular news media and believe everything they say. They don't read, researching anything, so they are virtually ignorant to the facts. Hence they continue to vote for and electing/re-electing those who deceive.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hassan, you nailed it! Excellent....

    ReplyDelete
  17. Toussaint L’Ouverture is a prominent slave in the history of the slave trade. He rose up and fought the French oppressors. You can see a clip of his last moments in prison from the film “The Last Days of Toussaint L’Ouverture” – a short film – http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2468184/

    ReplyDelete
  18. Kenneth McClentonNovember 4, 2010 1:49 PM

    "Branded" offers the sincere intellectual honesty that many in our community must anchor their retrospects upon in order to fully understand the last bastion of slavery in America: Blacks Worship of the Democrat Party. To add measure to your earnest vibe, 55% of Latinos in Florida voted for Marco Rubio [http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/conservative-marco-rubio-won-55-percent]. Party was not their anchor!

    ReplyDelete
  19. This outstanding article should be posted on Black America web.

    ReplyDelete
  20. JAMES N. HALL IIINovember 4, 2010 1:58 PM

    GREAT JOB!!! IT'S THE BLACK LIBERALS KEEPING THEIR WHITE MASTER'S SLAVES ON THE DEMOCRAT'S PLANTATION!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Figures DP would be here buckdancing and grinning over Massa's Tuesday night victory.

    Now can one of you happy conservative negroes explain exactly what the GOP plan for economic recovery is?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Another point.

    DP continues with the coonservative tapdance that "black Americans have been flimflammed by the Democrats."

    Riddle me this Ruckus.

    Since it was the Republicans and their haribrained policies who created the economic mess we find ourselves in, what then to say about the people who just voted them back in???

    ReplyDelete
  23. Ha! The return of uptownsteve!

    Did they grow weary of your high jinks on CBW's page? We shall see what we shall see in regards to Republican policy. Nevertheless, no matter how many times you lefties try to blame the financial collapse on the right it will never make it true.

    http://tinyurl.com/2fcqb2y

    ReplyDelete
  24. Nah. CBW seems to have stopped posting.

    She must have gotten hired as Glenn Beckkk's fulltime housekeeper.

    Anyhow, care to answer my question?

    What is the GOP plan for economic recovery?

    Because now that they have the House, "Obama is a Socialist" isn't going to cut it.

    ReplyDelete
  25. "Anyhow, care to answer my question?"

    I thought I had! If the former answer was insufficient, rather than engage in an infinite regress, the default outcome of all exchanges with you uptownsteve, I will have to say–Nope!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Unbelievable!!!

    You black righties are the biggest frauds on earth.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Nah, just uninterested in engaging in a defense of policies with you that have yet to be implemented. Not what I would consider a profitable use of time.

    If you care to highlight a specific point in this article that you disagree with, or if you want to address the video I posted earlier to impeach your assertions of the party responsible for the financial collapse, that would be worthy.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Rob in AnnapolisNovember 4, 2010 7:21 PM

    Digtal, great read. The midterms were devastating to the power structure of the Democrats in the House and in many of the state legislatures. As you so correctly point out, when will the Black community rise up against the Democrat leadership?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Excellent article, as always, Hassan. Thank you. :)

    ReplyDelete
  30. I was actually thinking of the Einstein quote about insanity is a good argument for phasing out the welfare programs created by LBJ. They have certainly failed in their promise to end poverty. Since they have failed to achieve those objectives after thirty years of implementation, politicians would have to be insane to keep pouring money into something that doesn't work. The biggest obstacle to eliminating welfare, however, is that the program itself destroyed the original support system, otherwise known as "the family." One thought about the elections in general, which would explain why Barney Frank and Harry Reid are still in office is that the familiar is often preferred to the unknown and if either person was booted, the state they represent would lose seniority and the perks that are associated with it. As a former Illnois native, I believe that when Roland Burris was appointed by former Governor Blagojveich days or weeks before the Governor was impeached, he promised to only "fill the gap" until the next election and then step aside. Before we left the state, there were some stories that Senator Burris may have either given contributions to Blago in exchange for the appointment, though I never found out if they were true. That might have sealed his fate and forced him to really live out the promise that he had made to step aside.

    ReplyDelete
  31. "As you so correctly point out, when will the Black community rise up against the Democrat leadership?"

    For what?

    It isn't the Democratic Leadership who cut off funds for inner city revitalization, ended affirmative action programs, walk around with pictures of the black President with a bone through his nose, spit and cursed black legislators on the steps of the Capitiol, and most importantly, REFUSES TO ASK FOR THE BLACK VOTE.

    The GOP only wants obedient Negroes who dance to their tune.

    The minute any black challenges them on the racist practices they've employed openly for 40 years, they get kicked to the curb.

    Talk to J.C. Watts and Colin Powell

    ReplyDelete
  32. Uptownsteve; your circular, inane thought processes indicate clear inability to reason normally, which in turn indicates the unavoidable necessity for prescribed interdiction: some yet-to-be-uncovered imbalance prevents logical processing of data input.

    Try meds.

    A. Einstein

    ReplyDelete
  33. Back in 2000 I had a chance to go see George W. Bush in St. Joseph Michigan. St. Joe, a very white community borders with Benton Harbor which is a very black community.

    On our way up we took a wrong turn somewhere and wound up in Benton Harbor. I wasn't so much surprised to see Democratic yard signs all over the place but what did surprise me was the "Vote No to School Vouchers" signs in the same yards. No other group of people stands to benefit more from the voucher program than blacks, yet they outright rejected it.

    Education is the key to escaping the plight that so many minorities are trapped in. The Dems do no greater disservice to loyal backers than to back the teachers unions on this issue to the peril of the black community. Even with the success of the vouchers program in D.C. during the Bush years, Obama was very quick to terminate the program at the behest of the unions and there was very little outcry from the parents.

    You are so right Hassan, it's not a black thing it's a "D" thing.

    ReplyDelete
  34. It is a little depressing that it seems it is going to have to take WWIII for urban areas to vote conservative though. Star Parker not winning??? She's a great role model for any person.

    But hey, I see the GOP cleaned up in Michigan...there's is hope for Detroit, even if they have given it kicking and screaming :)

    ReplyDelete
  35. Great piece Hassan! You are a gifted writer. When I was in management at UPS, our bosses would always tell us that if an employee eventually needed to be terminated, we had to first look at ourselves to determine if we did everything possible to make that employee a success. I, like other Black conservatives, do feel a sense of frustration when I see ineffective politicians continually reelected in our communities. What seems so obvious to us should be just as obvious to them. But are we asking ourselves and our party if we are doing everything possible to sell the conservative philosophy to the AA community?

    ReplyDelete
  36. You raise an interesting question, it is not at all easy to pierce the Black Democrat paradigm. I talk to my friends, family and associates all the time and most just don't get it. They have been so thoroughly indoctrinated. Even the Christians have this amazing ability to disconnect from the core ungodliness of the liberal platform sometimes rationalizing even abortion. They only see the liberal as this beneficial stream of entitlements, without ever counting the cost.

    They cannot see the destructive pathological downward spiral that is wrought by liberal policies in our communities. I am sure you have come up against this brick wall on more than one occasion.

    ReplyDelete
  37. 'I am sure you have come up against this brick wall on more than one occasion.'

    Many many times. I think part of our frustration is the unrealistic expectation that we can and should convince the 90% plus of African Americans who vote Democratic to do a 180 and vote 90% plus Republican. I would argue that all this would do would place us in the same position as we are now - our votes being eventually taken for granted. We have more electoral power when we're represented in both parties. Those AA's who are die hard liberals and who are stuck in a pre civil rights paradigm are probably better off in the Democrat party. As evidenced by the comments of our new and current members, there are plenty of us out here who share our beliefs and values. And I also believe that there are many of us who share our beliefs and values who are in the closet and need to see people that look like them unabashedly sharing their beliefs in the public arena. As I stated earlier in this thread, we have to make a consistent and credible case to our people.

    ReplyDelete
  38. This is really some sick crap.

    "They cannot see the destructive pathological downward spiral that is wrought by liberal policies in our communities. I am sure you have come up against this brick wall on more than one occasion."

    DP are you out of your freakin mind?

    50 years ago before the great Civil Rights legislation (WHICH CONSERVATIVES OPPOSED) over 60 percent of black America was in poverty.

    In that period the black middle class has tripled.

    One reason why black conservatives will always be pariahs in the black community is because you continue to lie to and about your own people.

    It serves your purpose to portray black Americans as ignorant ghetto cretins in order to justify your distance from the community.

    How about trying this.

    Maybe if you could speak to your fellow blacks with respect, stop questioning our intelligence, and proceed to convince black folks how Republicanism will benefit them you will get a hearing.

    Suggesting that we are dummies waiting for a government handout is not going to be well recieved.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Matches up with the Section Eight town I live in here in The Mojave Desert. It has a "correctional facility" so guess what it is like here. Even with the large number of us that work at Edwards AFB, the entitlement to endless largess is evident.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I'm teaching in an inner-city school in Savannah which is 98% AA. Savannah is trying to lift families out of generational poverty by knocking down old project communities and building beautiful new brick homes. It's nice to have a nice house, but it would be better to have a decent job. It would even be better for kids to have two parents at home who care about where their kids are from 3:00 after school until all hours of the morning and to make sure they do their homework and respect their teachers. What can be done?

    ReplyDelete
  41. "How about trying this.

    Maybe if you could speak to your fellow blacks with respect, stop questioning our intelligence, and proceed to convince black folks how Republicanism will benefit them you will get a hearing.



    Suggesting that we are dummies waiting for a government handout is not going to be well recieved."

    hassan i agree wiht steve on this point!

    djohn

    ReplyDelete
  42. Uptownsteve is a very clever fellow,

    You will notice that he said "Conservatives" opposed the civil rights act of 1964. He chose his words carefully because he knows that it was the Republican party that voted overwhelmingly to support the legislation and the Democratic party that opposed it.

    This is an important distinction in uptownsteves mind because he thinks all of those racist Democrats became Republicans and took over the party spawning the modern conservative movement.

    A few, when they realized the un-American progressive wing of the Democratic party was growing more and more powerful. Strom Thurmond would be the example of this.

    However, the overwhelming majority of those racist Democrats stayed just that, Racist Democrats. Men like Al Gore, Sr. Ex Klansman Robert Byrd, Wallace, Faubus... They just changed tactics.

    Here's the point that the social engineers that people like uptownsteve cheer for can never explain. While poverty has receded over the decades, (the political philosophy responsible is debatable)even in the Black community, all the important healthy society indicators have declined.

    Illegitimacy in the Black Community has skyrocketed 1960 the rate stood at 26%, far exceeding the national average which was in the single digits. Today Black illegitimacy stands above 70%.

    Democrat Patrick Moynihan shocked by the 26% illegitimacy rate of Blacks in the 60's surmised it was driven by poverty. President Johnson's "Great Society" was the remedy. Instead the rate has escalated.

    If the Black middle class has tripled why has the illegitimacy rate tripled as well? Why are blacks less likely to marry? Why is our birthrate slowing? What has happened to the Black Family?

    If these progressive policies now ruling the Black community are so progressive, why are all the measurable indicators so regressive? Why the disproportionate number of Black men in prisons? You can argue an unfair legal system, but you have to be doing a crime to get caught and then be subject to that unfair system. Shouldn't a larger middle class decrease black criminal activity? In the 1960's blacks still gave 40% of their votes to the Republican party.

    Why the failing schools, if the progressives are so smart, they control the inner city school systems? In Michigan, the schools in Detroit get the same money per student from the state that the schools in Grosse Pointe get?

    No djohn and uptownsteve I'm not saying that we are dummies, I'm saying we are insane. djohn read the scripture I ended this article again.

    “For that they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD; They would none of my counsel, they despised all my reproof. Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices.” Proverbs 1:29-31

    ReplyDelete
  43. Let's get back to my original point, If Al Gore, Sr. was a racist and the Democratic party was the party of the racists for the vast majority of our history, why would you join the party of racists if you yourself are not a racist.

    If you are Al Gore, Jr. and you disagree with your father's party politically, wouldn't it make since to go to the other party. Bill Clinton said he hated the racism he grew up around in Arkansas, yet he joined the party that drove that racism all over the country.

    As I said before:

    "...you have the just plain stupid black leaders who have been selectively bred to drink the Kool-Aid with an insatiable thirst despite the glaring evidence of the devastating toll that liberal policies have wreaked upon the black community. These are the people that are most responsible for the day to day promotion of the liberal mindset, they are the triumph of the changed southern democratic strategy adopted after they realized they couldn’t win with fire hoses, attack dogs and the hangman’s noose.

    If you can no longer lynch them and beat them with sticks, rot them from within, sap their will to overcome by their own energy, control them with entitlements so they live in constant fear of losing them. This way they stay ignorant and servile and they will thank their oppressors who now love them."

    ReplyDelete
  44. The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.
    -- Albert Einstein, in a letter responding to philosopher Eric Gutkind, who had sent him a copy of his book Choose Life: The Biblical Call to Revolt; quoted from James Randerson, "Childish Superstition: Einstein's Letter Makes View of Religion Relatively Clear: Scientist's Reply to Sell for up to £8,000, and Stoke Debate over His Beliefs" The Guardian, (13 May 2008)

    I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own -- a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms.
    -- Albert Einstein, obituary in New York Times, 19 April 1955, quoted from James A Haught, "Breaking the Last Taboo" (1996)

    [Excerpt]
    A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.
    -- Albert Einstein, "Religion and Science," New York Times Magazine, 9 November 1930

    [Passage]
    It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere.... Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.
    -- Albert Einstein, "Religion and Science," New York Times Magazine, 9 November 1930

    ReplyDelete
  45. You've been played Hassan.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

    ReplyDelete
  46. Bob Herbert, a New York Times columnist, reported a 1981 interview with Lee Atwater, published in Southern Politics in the 1990s by Prof. Alexander P. Lamis, in which Lee Atwater discussed politics in the South:

    You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.

    And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger".[4]

    Herbert wrote in the same column, "The truth is that there was very little that was subconscious about the G.O.P.'s relentless appeal to racist whites. Tired of losing elections, it saw an opportunity to renew itself by opening its arms wide to white voters who could never forgive the Democratic Party for its support of civil rights and voting rights for blacks."[31]

    All it takes are a few morons to buy into the Republican lies...even better if some of those morons are black and ignorant of American History beyond the mid-60's.

    ReplyDelete
  47. LOL you are quoting the New York Times? The most biased paper in the land? It was the Democrats saying Nigger in 1954! When Eisenhower and the Republicans began to end segregation and do away with the Democrats "separate but equal" policies, first begun by liberal favorite Woodrow Wilson when he began to segregate the federal government, it was men like George Wallace and Orvil Faubus, that raised the Confederate battle flag above southern municipal buildings.

    You really don't know that the Civil Rights Bill passed because of the Republicans? It was the Civil Rights Act of 1957 that kick started the movement even though the Democrats squashed it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1957

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964#By_party

    I addressed Nixon's southern strategy at the beginning and the end of my last posts Ramius, you completely ignored the questions I raised.

    Even though President Johnson oversaw the passing of the 1964 Bill it was President Nixon that gave it teeth.

    http://hnn.us/articles/5331.html

    As this excellent article on George Mason Universities History News Network points out:

    "In a 1970 memo, presidential counselor Daniel Patrick Moynihan wrote, “There has been more change in the structure of American public school education in the last month than in the past 100 years.” And, like going to China, only Nixon could have done it.

    While much is made over his “Southern strategy” in 1968, few understand that the Southern strategy brought the South back into the nation’s body politic by appealing to sentiments that united all Americans: patriotism, duty, and cooperation. Nixon refused to condescend to Southerners. He treated them as Americans, equal in every way to Northerners. And because Nixon took that course, he was able to achieve one of the greatest civil rights triumphs of the twenty-first century: the peaceful desegregation of Southern schools."

    All you know is what your handlers are feeding you Ramius, escape the plantation, look beyond what the liberals are expunging from the public record. Read "wrong On Race"

    http://www.amazon.com/Wrong-Race-Democratic-Partys-Buried/dp/023060062X

    "Unfounded Loyalty"

    http://www.amazon.com/Unfounded-Loyalty-Depth-Between-Democrats/dp/1562290738

    ReplyDelete
  48. And for goodness sakes, if you want to be taken seriously, don't quote a New York Times columnist. Witness the simple illogical nature of this statement:

    "The truth is that there was very little that was subconscious about the G.O.P.'s relentless appeal to racist whites. Tired of losing elections, it saw an opportunity to renew itself by opening its arms wide to white voters who could never forgive the Democratic Party for its support of civil rights and voting rights for blacks."[31]

    But they could forgive the Republican party which voted in even higher percentages for Civil Rights than the Democrats? 80% Republican Vs 60% Democrats. Did they all of a sudden forget that a few years earlier it was the Republicans sending the national guard down to Arkansas and other places to force their school doors open to Black students?

    Did they forget the Republican Party was begun with the express purpose of ending slavery?

    The Republican Party name was christened in an editorial written by New York newspaper magnate Horace Greeley. Greeley printed in June 1854:

    "We should not care much whether those thus united (against slavery) were designated 'Whig,' 'Free Democrat' or something else; though we think some simple name like 'Republican' would more fitly designate those who had united to restore the Union to its true mission of champion and promulgator of Liberty rather than propagandist of slavery."

    Did they forget the majority at that time of Black congressman had been elected on the Republican ticket going back to reconstruction? The only Black Senators had been Republican including Edward William Brooke, III who served from 1967-1979, until 1993 when Carol Moseley Braun became the first Black Democratic Senator.

    "All it takes are a few morons to buy into the Republican lies...even better if some of those morons are black and ignorant of American History beyond the mid-60's."

    The problem is that the left has warped history beyond the mid 1960's, controlling the dialog they have shaped a history that fit's their agenda.

    George W. Bush spent more on programs and entitlements for the poor than Clinton did and far more than Obama has so far in his presidency. Bush also gave more in aid to Africa than any President in History.

    Obama openly declared that if we follow his course of action the price of energy in America will skyrocket, which we are already beginning to see. Who do you think will suffer most percentage wise from those policies?

    Again, since Blacks switched parties, beyond shallow things like more Black celebrity millionaires, has the plight of the black community improved or degraded?

    Are our families as strong as they once were? Are we having less illegitimate children or more? Are we aborting less of our babies? Are less of our men going to jail? Are our children improving in our schools? Are we helping each other like we used to? Are our streets safer?

    Not according to the old folks that I know.

    ReplyDelete
  49. "George W. Bush spent more on programs and entitlements for the poor than Clinton did and far more than Obama has so far in his presidency."

    LIES.

    This is what Obama has done although he did a poor job of communicating this.

    Health Care Bill (children's health insurance)
    Easy to sue employer for pay discrimination
    Equal Pay (for Women) (languished in Congress for years)
    Credit Card Companies (prohibits sudden interest rate hikes)
    FDA unprecedented power to regulate tobacco companies
    federal crime to commit assualt based on sexual orientation
    increased funds for HBCUs and other educational institution
    major revamping of how college loans are being handed out (guaranteed loans will be offered only by DOE; no longer by banks)
    Stimulus Bill (single largest tax cut, clean energy, education and health reform, etc.)
    Financial Reform Law (roll-back of financial deregulation)
    Did more for veterans than any other President in a very long time (expanded VA access; for female soldiers, additional assistance
    for caregivers for veterans; increased military weaponry and support)
    Land Conversation Bill
    Consumer Financial Protection Agency
    Shrunk deficit (by a small amount)
    Increased unemployment benefits (over Republican objections)
    Tax cut for middle class

    ReplyDelete
  50. As for you other comments

    OOW births are up across the board.

    50% of American marriages end in divorce

    Violent crime was actually much higher 30 years ago and dropped to record modern levels in the 90s in allignment with a booming economy which Bush and the Republicans pissed away.

    But let me ask you something DP?

    Do you honestly think blacks were better off under Jim Crow?

    That ever since the Civil Rights Movement everything has gone to hell in Black America?

    We know that's what racists like Buchanan and Limbaugh think but do you A BLACK MAN agree?

    ReplyDelete
  51. I am really beginning to doubt your level of intelligence uptownsteve! Did you read what i posted or are you incapable of understanding what you read. It was the Republicans that began the Civil Rights movement. Jim Crow? It is entitlement dependency as orchestrated by the Democrats that has lead to our social degradation.

    The Civil Rights Movement was key, we have gone to "hell in Black America" as you put it because we followed the wrong paradigm after the Civil Rights Movement began.

    Blacks, we as a community were much stronger when we were depending upon ourselves and our own energy. The Civil Rights movement wasn't about giving black folks hand outs, that's not what the leaders were asking for.

    They were asking that the impediments put in place to hinder black advancement by racist America be removed. We can do it ourselves if you get out of the way and stop judging us according to our race and look at what we can do if you stop getting in the way.

    MLK said judge us by the content of our character not by our race. The paradigm you embrace is one were you expect America to look at our race as if we are owed something and then make things easier.

    The only breaks I want are the ones I earn by my own energy and the conduct it takes to make those breaks available to me and my people.

    Yes illegitimate births are up across the board but you are an abject fool if you do not see the vast disparity.You have to be smarter than this!

    50% of marriages may end in divorce but the vast majority of Black folks are not even getting married to begin with hence the overwhelming illegitimacy numbers.

    72% of our children are born to unwed mothers, you have to see how tragically weak your argumentation is! At least I hope you do!

    "At least statistically. The marriage rate for African Americans has been dropping since the 1960s, and today, we have the lowest marriage rate of any racial group in the United States. In 2001, according to the U.S. Census, 43.3 percent of black men and 41.9 percent of black women in America had never been married, in contrast to 27.4 percent and 20.7 percent respectively for whites. African American women are the least likely in our society to marry. In the period between 1970 and 2001, the overall marriage rate in the United States declined by 17 percent; but for blacks, it fell by 34 percent. Such statistics have caused Howard University relationship therapist Audrey Chapman to point out that African Americans are the most uncoupled people in the country." - Washington Post 6/26/2006 article by Joy Jones

    No one says that President Obama hasn't accomplished anything while in office, I question the wisdom of what he has accomplished.

    The economy boomed in the 90s because of the "Contract with America" because just like Obama, Clinton got his butt kicked in the midterms because he did not know what he was doing anymore than Obama does now.

    At least Clinton was smart enough to step aside and let the adults sort things out so he could take the credit later.

    The economy continued to do well for the first 61/2 years of W.'s presidency we saw uninterrupted economic growth and unemployment on an average of 5.2% the exact same as it was during Clinton. He screwed up the deficit because he signed off on every spending bill that came along.

    The collapse was triggered by Fannie and Freddie who the Dems argued were as solid as a rock and fought every attempt at reform suggested by President Bush and no amount of media controlled revisionist history will change that.

    Stop with the vacuous leftist talking points and think for yourself!

    ReplyDelete
  52. Digital Publius

    "Blacks, we as a community were much stronger when we were depending upon ourselves and our own energy. The Civil Rights movement wasn't about giving black folks hand outs, that's not what the leaders were asking for."

    I'll ask you again and hopefully you will answer.

    Do you believe that black people were better off under Jim Crow because it sure sounds like that's what you're saying.

    AND WHAT THE F*&%k are you ranting about "handouts" for????

    What freakin handouts?

    Can you even answer or do you just reguritate the garbage your rightwing massas put in your mouth?

    ReplyDelete